WTO appealApril 8, 2007, 2:39 pm (6 years ago)
A ruling of the tiny Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbuda that has been keenly anticipating was made by World Trade Association officials this week, who made a decision that was found in favor of the islanders in their long David and Goliath tussle over online gambling with massive neighbor the United States.
The global trade body's highest judges said, the United States ignored a WTO dispute ruling that found it discriminates against foreign gambling companies and nations by banning payments to gaming Web sites while allowing bets on its own soil.
At Party Gaming Plc shares jumped as much as 16 percent, which showed that the victory was immediately greeted with significant jumps in online gambling company shares trading on the London stock exchange Antigua and Barbuda, a Caribbean nation of 80 000 people and the smallest government ever to lodge a WTO complaint, scored an initial victory against United States online gambling restrictions when the WTO found in April 2005 that the U.S. had pledged to open the industry to competition 10 years earlier.
Today's ruling rejects a U.S. appeal against that particular factor.
The U.S. exacerbated its weak position in the dispute by passing legislation five months ago aimed at denying the estimated $12 billion global business to American residents, who accounted for half of the market at the time. Causing extensive international commercial damage to companies and investors in the process, the U.S. Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act banned credit card companies from processing payments to online betting sites.
Antiguan Finance Minister, Dr. Errol Cort, said that the ruling offers hope to the global online gambling industry currently under siege by the U.S. Department of Justice. "It the WTO ruling vindicates all that we have been saying for years about the discriminatory trade practices of the United States,'' Dr. Cort said in a statement.
Gretchen Hamel, a spokesperson for the U.S. Trade Representatives Office, agreed that the ruling had gone against her country, but insisted that the U.S. would maintain a ban on Internet gambling financial transactions to "protect public order and public morals'' as long as it doesn't discriminate against foreign companies."
Hamel said "We are currently reviewing our options,” without commenting further on the widespread forms of betting permitted throughout the USA that has not been the subject of negative legislation.
The U.S. has argued that the prohibitions pre-dating the UIGEA in October 2006 apply to both foreign and American betting services and the WTO's decision only applies to gambling on horseracing, which is an exempted activity under the law, to discriminate against foreign companies.
The U.S. added that its latest law isn't covered by the WTO ruling and said that its 1995 commitment to open gambling to foreign companies was "an oversight" by the Clinton administration.
The UIGEA has caused income for the 32 registered online casinos in Antigua and Barbuda to fall to $130 million a year from $1 billion in 2000. Aside from extensive international damage to investments and companies, the Antiguan government claims. The country developed online gambling to boost a tourism dependent economy after several hurricanes in the 1990s.
Antigua successfully argued in its complaint that the U.S. protects its domestic gambling industry while failing to live up to its international commitments.
Both within and outside the USA, the UIGEA has been widely criticized. Congressman Barney Frank, chairman of the influential House Financial Services Committee, who is about to launch an attempt to repeal the Act, described it as "the stupidest law ever passed."
Commissioner for the European Union's internal market, Charlie McCreevy, labeled the U.S. law "a protectionist measure'' early this year, saying the EU should complain to the U.S. after Congress passed the legislation barring credit card companies from processing payments.
U.K. Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell, when the UIGEA was enacted, compared it to the American alcohol ban of the 1920s, saying the measure may force online gambling underground into an unregulated black market.
"This is a smashing success for Antigua in every possible way,'' John Ashe, the Caribbean island nation's ambassador to the WTO in Geneva, said in a statement.”The ruling clears up any lingering doubt that Antigua has obtained a clear and convincing win over the United States and it is now time for the United States to meet its international trade obligations.''
Antigua may seek sanctions in the form of withdrawing intellectual property protection for U.S. trademarks or copyright. Known as "cross-retaliation,'' such sanctions are legal at the WTO when an economy can't afford to impose sanctions in the form of higher customs duties on goods.
Comments (0) Back to Top